I have been asked what the difference was between a squire and an esquire in the Middle Ages
The short answer is that they were just two different ways of spelling the same word, derived from the Old French escuier, esquier, eskuwier, or eschuier. A squire was either a superior servant, below a knight and above a yeoman or valet, or a person of the social rank from which such men were recruited, typically a country gentleman with less land than a knight. By the 14th century, some wealthy squires had as much land as a knight,and squires in the first sense could come from the families of respectable merchants: Geoffrey Chaucer, who served as a royal squire, was a vintner's son.
By this time a squire in service might be a domestic servant, but might also serve as a military commander or, like Chaucer, a bureaucrat.
The words didn't diverge in meaning until the 17th century or later, when esquire in England became a polite suffix for any person that might be considered a gentleman,including a lawyer, but squire tended to refer to substantial country gentlemen.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Thanks!
Interesting that attornies often have the word esquire, abbreviated, esq., on their business/calling cards. Based upon the definition above, seems to me anyone considering themselves a gentleman, not 'only' attornies, can add 'esq.' after their names. Cool.
Tom, it's other way around. While times change, as of the 19th century, when these words were still in common usage, almost any esquire was also a gentleman, but not every gentleman was an esquire - both denote landed gentry, but an esquire was descended from higher nobility.
Post a Comment